Moradipour, P; Noorzaei, J; Jaafar, M S and Aziz, F N A A (2013) An improved computational method in structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), pp. 288-315. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: In structural, earthquake and aeronautical engineering and mechanical vibration, the solution of dynamic equations for a structure subjected to dynamic loading leads to a high order system of differential equations. The numerical methods are usually used for integration when either there is dealing with discrete data or there is no analytical solution for the equations. Since the numerical methods with more accuracy and stability give more accurate results in structural responses, there is a need to improve the existing methods or develop new ones. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, a new time integration method is proposed mathematically and numerically, which is accordingly applied to single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems. Finally, the results are compared to the existing methods such as Newmark's method and closed form solution. Findings: It is concluded that, in the proposed method, the data variance of each set of structural responses such as displacement, velocity, or acceleration in different time steps is less than those in Newmark's method, and the proposed method is more accurate and stable than Newmark's method and is capable of analyzing the structure at fewer numbers of iteration or computation cycles, hence less time-consuming. Originality/value: A new mathematical and numerical time integration method is proposed for the computation of structural responses with higher accuracy and stability, lower data variance, and fewer numbers of iterations for computational cycles.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computational method; direct time integration methods; newmark's method; Parviz' method; structural dynamics; structural response |
| Index terms: | variance, loading, acceleration, earthquake, dynamics, stability, accuracy, vibration, methodology, integration, computation |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, environmental hazards, project controls, organizational analysis, measurement and scaling, professional development, structural engineering, research methods, construction operations, computational methods, mechanical systems |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here