Lean six sigma in SMEs: An exploration through literature review

Prasanna, M and Vinodh, S (2013) Lean six sigma in SMEs: An exploration through literature review. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), pp. 224-250. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose — The purpose of this paper is to explore the researches reported in literature on Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and determine the avenues by which lean anchorage can be improved in LSS implementation. – The literature on lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and LSS was reviewed. The literature has been reviewed from four major perspectives. The findings of this review were used to find the methods for the improvement of lean anchorage. The proposed model is explained with a hypothetical case study. – The major finding of the exploration reported in this article is that the lean anchorage in LSS process is found to be weak and it has to be enhanced for improving the effectiveness of LSS approach. The results derived from the hypothetical case study have been presented. – The researches on LSS from the perspective of implementation in small- and medium-sized enterprises have been explored. But the lean anchorage method proposed could be extended to other organizations also. – The findings of this literature exploration pinpoint the need for enhancing the efficacy of LSS approach. – This article has identified and presented systematically four major perspectives of LSS. The deficiency has been identified and the improvement methods have been proposed. Hence, the contributions of this article are original and valuable. . All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: lean manufacturing; lean production; small and medium enterprises
Index terms: exploration, lean manufacturing, six sigma, literature review, lean production, anchorage, effectiveness, implementation, case study
Subjects: performance measurement, structural engineering, manufacturing engineering, performance management, data collection methods, environmental resource management, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here