Agumba, J N and Haupt, T C (2014) The implementation of health and safety practices: Do demographic attributes matter? Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(4), pp. 530-550.
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study was to investigate the personnel attributes perception on reliable and valid health and safety (H&S) practices within small- and medium-sized construction enterprises (SMEs) in South Africa. It explores whether these valid and reliable H&S practices could be implemented based on the demographic attributes, namely, years of experience in the construction industry, number of years working in the current organisation and educational level. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method approach was used to conduct this research, namely, Delphi and questionnaire survey. A structured questionnaire consisting of 31 H&S practices categorised into five major H&S practices was developed from extensive literature review and the participation of 20 purposive sampled H&S experts. Sixteen H&S experts completed four iterations. A convenient sample of 1,450 SMEs was obtained. In total, 228 questionnaires were returned, of which 216 responses were useable for analysis. The data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to determine the validity, reliability and acceptability of the H&S practices. Finally, one-way ANOVA and t-test were conducted to determine personnel attributes perception on the implementation of the H&S practices. Findings – The five major H&S practices (constructs), namely, upper management commitment and involvement in H&S, employee involvement and empowerment in H&S, project supervision, project H&S planning and communication in H&S and H&S resources and training, were retained as reliable and valid practices of H&S within construction SMEs at project level. One-way ANOVA established no statistical significant difference on the respondents' perception of the H&S practices. However, t-test revealed statistically significant difference on the respondents' perception on, upper management commitment and involvement in H&S and H&S resources and training. The respondents with post-matric qualification strongly agreed that upper management are committed and involved in H&S. Originality/value – The findings may help construction SMEs to use these H&S practices to manage H&S in their projects. The SMEs may also consider the level of education of their personnel when implementing H&S practices of upper management and H&S resources and training.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | implementation; practices; health and safety; demographic attributes |
| Index terms: | methodology, questionnaire, South Africa, health and safety practices, empowerment, exploratory factor analysis, personnel, health and safety, literature review, commitment, confirmatory factor analysis, survey, implementation, construction industry, supervision, employee involvement, demographic attribute, qualification, mixed method, validity |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, control systems, psychology, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, management, educational resources, research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, occupational health and safety management, demography, industry analysis, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Education, Human Resources, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here