Factors contributing to non-value adding activities in South African construction

Emuze, F; Smallwood, J and Han, S (2014) Factors contributing to non-value adding activities in South African construction. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(2), pp. 223-243. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Non-value adding activities (NVAAs) are considered to be problematic in the management of projects. Reported research findings suggest that these NVAAs consume resources without necessarily adding value to completed tasks. The main aim of the research is to provide insights and plausible explanations concerning how NVAAs can propagate poor performance in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports on a quantitative survey conducted among public sector clients, consulting engineers, and civil engineering contractors in South Africa. Using a framework that was developed from the literature reviewed, the study proposed three conceptual qualitative models that were based on system dynamics. Findings: The study suggests that NVAAs that are prevalent in South African construction can impact project performance negatively in the form of cost and time overruns. It can also be argued that although there is commonality between NVAAs that are identified in South Africa and other countries, their frequency and effects on project performance differ. Research limitations/implications: The findings provide further insights about NVAAs that are related to the South African infrastructure sector only. Originality/value: The study, which is the first of such in South Africa, could lead to increased awareness among South African project stakeholders that are concerned about performance improvement from the lean construction perspective.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; non-value adding activities; performance; South Africa; system dynamics
Index terms: project performance, performance improvement, engineering contractor, time overrun, project stakeholder, system dynamics, methodology, infrastructure sector, South Africa, lean construction, survey, consulting engineer, public-sector client
Subjects: data collection methods, profession, computing systems, building construction, sociology, project controls, industry analysis, research methods, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, Geography, firms
Topics: Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here