Lordsleem Jr, A C and Melhado, S B (2014) Scope of design for production of wall partitions. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(2), pp. 263-279. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The design for production of wall partitions (DPWP) offers high potential for improving the design process of building in Brazil. However, one of the problems worth mentioning is the lack of accurate definition of scope which leads to doubts about what, when and how it should be prepared, developed and delivered by the designers. The purpose of this paper is to assess the application of the Brazilian Association of Design Managers and Coordinators (AGESC) handbook scopes of DPWP in building construction. Design/methodology/approach: A case study involving a field investigation of eight construction organisations and DPWP designers in the cities of Recife and Sao Paulo in Brazil. Findings: The results obtained have shown that conformity (with specification) - the reference scope adopted AGESC handbook DPWP - was not entirely fulfilled by the companies, while the agreement (personal opinion on the appropriateness of the specification) with the scope was even lower among them. The major difference was found between conformity and agreement among the construction companies. Originality/value: Guidelines concerning how to use the AGESC handbook for DPWP, description of potential uses and amplifying of the contributions to greater integration between expectations and resulting products, call for rational design and execution of non-loadbearing masonry in the Brazilian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Brazil; building construction; scope of design; wall partitions |
| Index terms: | investigation, construction industry, construction organization, case study, designer, integration, methodology, design manager, specification, design process, Brazil, building construction, construction company |
| Subjects: | organization, profession, data collection methods, design methods, research methods, Geography, contractual condition, building construction, organizational analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here