Sun, Y; Djouani, K; van Wyk, B J; Wang, Z and Siarry, P (2014) Hypothesis testing-based adaptive PSO. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(1), pp. 89-101. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: In this paper, a new method to improve the performance of particle swarm optimization is proposed. Design/methodology/approach: This paper introduces hypothesis testing to determine whether the particles trap into the local minimum or not, then special re-initialization was proposed, finally, some famous benchmarks and constrained engineering optimization problems were used to test the efficiency of the proposed method. In the revised manuscript, the content was revised and more information was added. Findings: The proposed method can be easily applied to PSO or its varieties. Simulation results show that the proposed method effectively enhances the searching quality. Originality/value: This paper proposes an adaptive particle swarm optimization method (APSO). A technique is applied to improve the global optimization performance based on the hypothesis testing. The proposed method uses hypothesis testing to determine whether the particles are trapped into local minimum or not. This research shows that the proposed method can effectively enhance the searching quality and stability of PSO.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; optimization algorithms; optimization and system/network identification |
| Index terms: | efficiency, testing, artificial intelligence, stability, methodology, optimization algorithm, performance-based |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, performance measurement, algorithms, research methods, performance management, artificial intelligence, professional practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here