The need for post-occupancy evaluation of public apartment buildings in Ghana

Agyefi-Mensah, S; Post, J; van Egmond, E; Badu, E and Mohammadi, M (2015) The need for post-occupancy evaluation of public apartment buildings in Ghana. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 13(2), pp. 315-333.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine and show why post-occupancy evaluation (POE) of public apartment buildings in Ghana as a product of design is important. Design/methodology/approach – By design the paper is descriptive. It uses a literature review as a method to summarize, synthesize and show the gaps in the existing knowledge on public apartment buildings in general and Ghana in particular. These arguments are brought together in a conceptual framework for approaching POE studies. Findings – This paper finds that gaps exist in the existing POE research knowledge regarding public apartment buildings in Ghana not only as residential settings but also as designed artifacts intended for use. Research limitations/implications – There is a need for scientific research which focus on the design and use of public apartment buildings in Ghana to provide empirical basis for design, policy and research decision-making. Social implications – This paper shows that occupants' feedback information is important, as it can benefits government, designers and builders, building regulators and managers, as well as end users. Originality/value – The paper contributes a conceptual framework based on which POE studies can be designed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural design; built environment research
Index terms: post-occupancy evaluation, manager, literature review, Ghana, methodology, end user, conceptual framework, architectural design, decision-making, designer, artifact, apartment building, regulator, built environment research, builder
Subjects: Geography, sociology, practitioner, decision analysis, research methods, evaluation methods, research management, construction type, data analysis and analytics, stakeholder, profession, theoretical framing, design practice
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here