Wu, M; Wang, L; Li, M and Long, H (2015) Alleviating feature fatigue in product development based on the bass model. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 13(3), pp. 350-368.
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to propose a novel method to predict and alleviate feature fatigue. Many products now are loaded with an extensive number of features. Adding more features to one product generally makes the product more attractive on the one hand but, on the other hand, may result in increasing difficulty to use the product. This phenomenon is called “feature fatigue”, which will lead to dissatisfaction and negative word-of-mouth (WOM). Feature fatigue will damage the brand’s long-term profit, and ultimately decrease the manufacturer’s customer equity. Thus, a problem of balancing the benefit of increasing “attractiveness” with the cost of decreasing “usability” exists. Design/methodology/approach – A novel method based on the Bass model is proposed to predict and alleviate feature fatigue. Product capability, usability and WOM effects are integrated into the Bass model to predict the impacts of adding features on customer equity in product development, thus helping designers alleviate feature fatigue. A case study of mobile phone development based on survey data is presented to illustrate and validate the proposed method. Findings – The results of the case study demonstrate that adding more features indeed increases initial sales; however, adding too many features ultimately decreases customer equity due to usability problems. There is an optimal feature combination a product should include to balance product capability with usability. The proposed method makes a trade-off between initial sales and long-term profits to maximize customer equity. Originality/value – The proposed method can help designers predict the impacts of adding features on customer equity in the early stages of product development. It can provide decision supports for designers to decide what features should be added to maximize customer equity, thus alleviating feature fatigue.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | customer satisfaction; product design; usability; bass model; feature fatigue; customer equity; word-of-mouth |
| Index terms: | product development, customer equity, word-of-mouth, methodology, usability, profit, survey, manufacturer, product design, decision support, customer satisfaction, feature fatigue, designer, case study |
| Subjects: | service delivery, management, research methods, decision analysis, innovation studies, practitioner, data collection methods, strategic management, profession, user-centered design, innovation and technology management, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here