Dada, J O and Musa, N A (2016) Key factors affecting the competence of quantity surveyors: Evidence from construction industry stakeholders in Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(3), pp. 461-474.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors affecting quantity surveyors' competence with a view to reducing them to key components. Design/methodology/approach The research adopts a data reduction system using the factor analysis statistical technique. A structured questionnaire was administered among major stakeholders in the Nigerian construction industry. The respondents were asked to give ratings on a 5-point Likert scale on factors affecting the competence of quantity surveyors. Based on the identified 11 factor variables, factor analysis was used to explore and detect the underlying relationship among the identified variables. Important measures such as Bartlett’s test of sphericity, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling accuracy and measure of sampling adequacy were used to test the appropriateness of the factor extraction. Findings The data reduction results in three key factor components: organization structure and team development, industrial exposure and route of educational training. Practical implications The findings provide a considerable insight into the issue of factors affecting quantity surveyors' competence and could have considerable implications on the training of quantity surveyors in Nigeria. Originality/value The paper provides information on major factors influencing the competence of quantity surveyors and the resulting implications on the training, development and practice of quantity surveying in Nigeria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nigeria; competence; key factors; continuous professional development; quantity surveyors; component analysis |
| Index terms: | component analysis, construction industry, sampling, factor analysis, Nigeria, quantity surveying, professional development, exposure, team development, competence, methodology, evidence, questionnaire, Likert scale, accuracy, surveying |
| Subjects: | profession, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, personnel development, professional development, Geography, public and environmental health, research methods, management, statistical analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here