Nganpet, N G and Biermann, E (2016) Image compression system for a 3U CubeSat. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(3), pp. 446-460.
Abstract
Purpose Research and application on the design, implementation and testing of an image compression system for a 3U CubeSat. Design/methodology/approach This paper is an intensive study on image compression technique, proposed design and approach on appropriate hardware for image compression on-board the CubeSats. Findings The paper reveals a method on improving image compression ration while maintaining the image quality unchanged. It also discusses about an appropriate hardware (world smallest super computer) for image compression on-board the CubeSats. Originality/value The study provides insight into image compression algorithm.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | image processing; implementing; satellite; software; compression; cubesat; entropy; gumstix; hardware; lossless; ratio; zacube-02 |
| Index terms: | image processing, hardware, implementation, testing, compression, entropy, methodology, image quality, satellite |
| Subjects: | computer hardware, contractual arrangements, professional practice, research methods, material properties and characteristics, computer vision, networking, thermal systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Procurement, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here