Oyewobi, L O; Windapo, A and Rotimi, J O B (2016) Relationship between decision-making style, competitive strategies and organisational performance among construction organisations. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(4), pp. 713-738.
Abstract
Purpose The decision-making styles and strategies of organisations play significant roles in their competitive advantage and the achievement of superior performance. The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of decision-making styles on the strength of the relationship between competitive strategy and organisational performance among large construction organisations based in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach The study focuses on large construction organisations in South Africa using a questionnaire survey to elicit information. The sample consists of 72 large construction organisations, and the measures of decision-making styles, competitive strategies and organisational performance used for the instrument utilised to elicit information were derived from the literature. Descriptive, parametric and multiple regression analyses were used to determine the effect of decision-making styles and competitive strategies on the organisations' performance. Findings The results of the study show that organisations utilize all types of decision-making styles, but the most significantly adopted styles are analytical and directive. The study found that decision-making styles influence organisational performance through competitive strategies. Research limitations/implications The research considered large construction organisations based in South Africa and operating in three provinces, where almost 75 per cent of all public projects are being implemented. The findings can be generalised to other large construction organisations functioning within the South African industry, because most of the organisations surveyed operate nationally. However, the findings may not be generalizable to the entire industry. Small and medium-sized organisations vary in terms of structure in relation to large organisations; hence, their decision-making styles may be different. Practical implications The study makes explicit the need to consider the role of different decision-making styles being practiced within organisations and how their moderating effect influences organisational performance beyond rational processes. A better understanding of this will enable organisations to achieve the total commitment of their staff to achieve superior performance. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature and body of knowledge on the strategic management of organisations. It underpins the assertion that decision-making styles and competitive strategies can influence organisational performance, and this is validated within the construction industry. Knowledge of the relationships between the variables measured in this paper will be beneficial to both owners and managers of construction organisations, because they provide the necessary information on how strategic decision-making styles influence the strategy adopted and, in turn, the organisational performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision-making; organisational performance; competitive strategy; contingency approach; decision-making style; organisational issues |
| Index terms: | commitment, strategy, survey, contingency approach, manager, body of knowledge, competitive strategy, multiple regression analysis, South Africa, decision-making, methodology, public project, strategic management, questionnaire, owner, decision-making style, construction organization, large construction organization, competitive advantage, construction industry, organizational issue, organizational performance |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, business, organization, knowledge management, economic analysis, psychology, Geography, infrastructure engineering, management, performance measurement, research methods, industry analysis, statistical analysis, market analysis, decision analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here