Rohdin, P; Dalewski, M and Moshfegh, B (2016) Combining a survey approach and energy and indoor environment auditing in historic buildings. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(1), pp. 182-195.
Abstract
Purpose – This paper presents an approach where a survey study is combined with energy and indoor environment auditing in the built environment. The combination of methods presented in this paper is one way to obtain a wider perspective on the indoor environment and energy use and also let the people in the building voice their comments on the indoor environment. This is arguably even more important in historic buildings where many of the physical properties are to a higher degree unknown when compared with conventional buildings. The purpose of the paper is to report the experiences from this research project. Design/methodology/approach – A combination of energy and indoor environment auditing and standardized occupant surveys. Findings – The main findings in the paper are related to the good agreement between results from standardized occupant surveys and physical measurements. The possibility to triangulate problems related to poor indoor conditions was shown to be one main advantage of the combined methodology presented in the paper. A standardized survey approach also allows benchmarking, in this case with two groups representing “average” buildings as well as a group representing well-functioning buildings. The use of records from building key cards was also shown to be an effective way of keeping track of activity in the building and thereby distribute internal gains. In addition, the paper reports a linear correlation between activity level and electricity use. Originality/value – The paper shows an effective way to investigate the performance, in terms of energy use as well as indoor environment, of historic buildings in use. This type of approach could benefit property owners, as it both allows benchmarking as well as investigating individual properties before, e.g., a refurbishment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment research; thermal comfort; refurbishment; energy efficiency; building survey; energy audit |
| Index terms: | occupant survey, historic building, building survey, survey, methodology, property owner, built environment research, benchmarking, energy efficiency, indoor environment, energy audit, physical property, thermal comfort, built environment, energy use |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, professional practice, environmental science, energy systems, data collection methods, construction type, research management, sociology, environmental engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, performance measurement, material properties and characteristics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here