Feldman, G; Shah, H; Chapman, C; Pärn, E A and Edwards, D J (2017) A systematic approach for enterprise systems upgrade decision-making: Outlining the decision processes. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(6), pp. 778-802.
Abstract
Purpose Enterprise systems (ES) upgrade is fundamental to maintaining a system’s continuous improvement and stability. However, while the extant literature is replete with research on ES upgrade decision-making, there is scant knowledge about how different decision processes facilitate this decision to upgrade. This paper aims to investigate and better understand these processes from an organisational perspective. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a qualitative survey design, and used a Web-based questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to collect data from 23 large organisations. Data accrued were qualitatively analysed and manually coded to identify the various decision processes undertaken during ES upgrade decisions. Findings Analysis results reveal complex interrelations between the upgrade drivers, the need to evaluate the new version’s functionality and the upgrade impact. Understanding the interaction between these elements influences the upgrade decision process. Research limitations/implications The study proposes ES upgrade processes that support a decision to upgrade major releases. Further research is required to offer either similar or conflicting arguments on the upgrade decision-making and provide a probabilistic generalisation of the decision-making processes. Originality/value The research offers a comprehensive and empirically supported methodical approach that embraces an evaluation of a new version’s functionality, technical requirements and concomitant upgrade implications as intrinsic decision processes. This approach assists in the decisions to establish the upgrade need and determine the level of change, effort required, impacts and associated benefits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | enterprise systems; decision processes; post-implementation phase; upgrade decision-making |
| Index terms: | enterprise system, interaction, post-implementation phase, decision process, decision-making process, continuous improvement, questionnaire, methodology, survey, functionality, stability, upgrade decision-making, interview |
| Subjects: | performance measurement, structural engineering, management, research methods, decision analysis, behavioral psychology, strategic management, data collection methods, design features, project delivery |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here