Project success and relationships from a stakeholder perspective: A pilot study

Abeysekera, V and McLean, C (2001) Project success and relationships from a stakeholder perspective: A pilot study. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.

Abstract

In this exploratory study the authors sought to understand the link between 'project success' and 'stakeholder relationships'. Additionally, it sought to identify the key ingredients necessary for the achievement of successful relationships. Criteria for 'project success' vary. 'Time' and 'cost' are the commonest with a lesser emphasis on quality. Criteria such as risk, conflict, and safety though usually excluded need to be reckoned. One of the key factors that lead to success with respect to these criteria is successful stakeholder relationship; a strong link exist between project success and relationships. Therefore, the knowledge of factors (ingredients) that lead to successful stakeholder relationships is necessary. Accordingly, this study finds the following to be the main 'ingredients' that make successful relationships. Cited in their ranked order, these are: Communication; ability to successfully manage the client; existence of key personnel; timeliness, taking ownership and accountability, having appropriate planning, control and administrative systems in place, understanding peoples' requirements and needs especially of the client; honesty; trust, sharing goals; keeping promises, organization structure and characteristics. Whilst these are the main ingredients for successful relationships, this study fails short in explaining 'how' these 'ingredients' influence stakeholder relationships; clearly, an area for further study. Moreover, with the discovery of new factors that has not been studied hitherto, there is grounds for further research. The type of stakeholder relationship has an effect on project success too. Most view the client-contractor relationship as having the greatest impact. A model that incorporates all these concepts has been provided and goes to enlighten further the link between 'project success' and 'stakeholder relationships'.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: project success; relationships; stakeholders
Index terms: ownership, personnel, project success, exploratory study, accountability
Subjects: liability law, management, research methods, economics, project management theory and practice
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 1 C

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here