So, C (2017) Intuitive design: Framing a software test system as a status reporting tool for business. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(2), pp. 149-165.
Abstract
This paper reveals that the conceptual framework, of how software teams can leverage the implicit information of implemented acceptance tests, yields the positive effects of intuitive understanding by business stakeholders and distinctly reduces manual quality assurance work.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | acceptance test-driven development; behavior-driven development; intuitive design; reporting tool; requirements management; user-centered design |
| Index terms: | requirements management, user-centred design, conceptual framework, intuitive design, reporting tool, framing, quality assurance, behaviour-driven development |
| Subjects: | data management, quality assurance, user-centred design, theoretical framing, software development, professional development, conceptual models, design methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here