Addy, M; Adinyira, E and Ayarkwa, J (2018) Antecedents of building information modelling adoption among quantity surveyors in Ghana: An application of a technology acceptance model. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(2), pp. 313-326. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to empirically study the factors that facilitate adoption of building information modelling (BIM) among quantity surveyors (QSs) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Design/methodology/approach: Using a quantitative approach, factors identified in the UTAUT are examined. The empirical investigation has been conducted using survey questionnaire. The data set has been obtained from 73 practicing QSs in Ghana. Findings: The results indicated a significant positive impact of effort expectancy, facilitation conditions and hedonic motivation towards BIM adoption. Surprisingly social influence and performance expectancy have a negative impact on BIM adoption. Practical implications: The structures uncovered in the study show that not all UTAUT factors are applicable within the study area. The findings provide a good backdrop in the development of policy and a roadmap for BIM implementation in Ghana. Originality/value: The original contribution and value of the paper is the use of UTAUT2 to provide empirical evidence on factors that facilitate BIM adoption in Ghana amongst QSs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adoption; building information modelling; Ghana; technology acceptance model |
| Index terms: | building information modelling, quantity surveying, Ghana, investigation, implementation, technology acceptance model, motivation, survey, methodology, evidence, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | acoustic properties, Geography, research methods, information systems, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, contractual arrangements, psychology |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here