De Silva, N; Rathnayake, U and Kulasekera, K M U B (2018) Under-reporting of construction accidents in Sri Lanka. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(6), pp. 850-868. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Under-reporting of occupational accidents is a common problem in many countries. This is mainly because of the shortfalls in accident reporting and recording systems. Construction industry being a hazardous industry, the rate of accidents is higher compared with other industries and apparently a high rate of under-reporting. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the rate of under-reporting, significant reasons for under-reporting and identify the shortcomings in the existing accident reporting system in Sri Lanka in aiming to recommend efficient mechanisms for occupational accident recording and reporting to construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: Both secondary and primary data were tapped to gather required data. The secondary data were extracted from the records available in year 2014-2015 at the office of the commissioner for workmen’s compensation and the industrial safety division of the Department of Labor (DoL) to analyze the rate of under-reporting. The primary data were obtained through expert interviews to explore the gaps in reporting system and to identify mechanisms to reduce under-reporting. Findings: The findings revealed 80 per cent of construction accidents are under-reported. Eight gaps in the current accident recording and reporting system and key recommendations at organizational and national level for its improvements were identified. Originality/value: The findings provide an insight of occupational safety and health (OSH) practices in construction industry and it can be used as an eye opening flash for safety law-makers and practitioners to revisit the existing regulations and practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident under-reporting; construction accidents; occupational safety and health |
| Index terms: | interview, commissioner, industrial safety, methodology, practitioner, construction accident, regulation, secondary data, construction industry, compensation, Sri Lanka, occupational accident, occupational safety and health |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, dispute resolution, practitioner, research methods, health risk and incident analysis, Geography, occupational health and safety management, political science, environmental health, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here