Indicators of collaborative design management in construction projects

Savolainen, J M; Saari, A; Männistö, A and Kähkonen, K (2018) Indicators of collaborative design management in construction projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(4), pp. 674-691. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Design management plays a significant role in value creation in a construction project. Within the last few decades, new design tools such as building information model have been introduced, which supposedly enhance design productivity and quality. However, no such revolution of design quality has emerged. Therefore, more research on how design management affects the quality of construction project is needed. The purpose of this paper is to better understand the connection between design management procedures and quality. Design/methodology/approach: This is a case study with a mixed-method approach. The data collection strategies used are quantitative user satisfaction survey and qualitative analysis over the documentation of the case project. Findings: A deductive analysis was conducted to four suggested indicators of beneficial collaboration. An explanation was found for how the quality of the project outcome can be forecasted from the management style and procedures. Research limitations/implications: The research was conducted as single case study, and therefore, greater data would enable further development of the indicators. Practical implications: The indicators have wide range of applicability: the clients can forecast the quality performance by evaluating the management procedures already during the project instead of waiting until the end of project. The indicator system also provides societal impact as it guides the clients to use the kind of managerial practices that improve the ability to create value in projects that are difficult to evaluate in money terms. Originality/value: The research provides a novel way to gain a holistic view with analytical indicator tools. The research contributes to lean design management literature by providing insight to the underlying mechanism of beneficial collaboration.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project management; design collaboration; indicators; lean design management; quality
Index terms: management style, case study, productivity, project outcome, quality performance, construction project management, design collaboration, design quality, strategy, survey, documentation, design management, methodology, user satisfaction, construction project, collaboration, value creation, qualitative analysis, collaborative design
Subjects: professional practice, project delivery, data collection methods, research design and methodology, project completion, client relations, design methods, management, economic development, research methods, production management, design process, project management theory and practice, professional development
Topics: Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here