Ulubeyli, S; Kazaz, A and Sahin, S (2018) Survival of construction SMEs in macroeconomic crises: Innovation-based competitive strategies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(4), pp. 654-673. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to present the effect of innovation on implementing competitive strategies (CSs) and to find their relationships on the survival of construction-related small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in macroeconomic crises. Design/methodology/approach: Data were compiled from construction SMEs in Turkey. The research used structural equation modeling to investigate the relationships between innovation, CSs and firm survival (FS). Findings: Innovative construction SMEs may implement differentiation and focus strategies and survive without CSs, whereas innovation may be obtained through cost leadership strategy. Also, differentiation and focus strategies may play a role to survive. However, the cost leadership strategy may be implemented after survival. Finally, differentiation strategy may be triggered by innovation and focus strategies. Research limitations/implications: The model may be applied on other construction organizations. Future studies may also examine the difference in findings concerning other industries and regions. Moreover, different factors may be added to the model. However, a larger group of samples could cause different results. Practical implications: This study may be a roadmap for practitioners to plan their firms' strategies, considering innovation, CSs and FS. In this context, they may pay attention to innovative production processes to survive. Social implications: Survived SMEs may sustain their works through the prevention of crisis-based unemployment. Hence, this benefit may bring a wealthier society. Originality/value: This research is first to propose a model connecting innovation and CSs for SMEs' survival in macroeconomic crises. This is convenient for rivalry of SMEs planning to be long-lasting enterprises.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction economic; construction innovation; strategy |
| Index terms: | Turkey, construction organization, future study, survival, prevention, production process, strategy, structural equation modelling, society, construction innovation, differentiation, competitive strategy, unemployment, practitioner, construction economics, methodology |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, financial analysis, statistical analysis, building construction, Geography, financial risk, management, manufacturing engineering, research methods, environmental science, economic analysis, practitioner, organization, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here