Wang, L (2018) The fuzzy in evaluation of concrete structure engineering. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(2), pp. 327-338. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: During the service condition of residential constructions with concrete structure, the influence of inside and exterior factors will result in different degrees of harm to concrete engineering. Therefore, it is very necessary to continue engineering work toward the concrete structure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the factors on the comprehensive performance of the concrete structure engineering. Design/methodology/approach: Applying a mathematics method to establish the comprehensive evaluation model of the concrete structure engineering performance, qualitative and quantitative methods were adopted for reinforced concrete structural performance analysis. Findings: The key to a safe construction project is to require all bidders to submit a written safety plan with their bids. The instruction to bidders must include guidelines for an acceptable safety plan and state clearly that the substance of the safety plan will be reviewed, and its adequacy will be a determining factor in who shall be selected as the contractor. Originality/value: Based on the characteristics of concrete structure, applying the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the concrete structure engineering comprehensive performance, an evaluation index system was built. The research combines quantitative method with qualitative method evaluation was made.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete structure; fuzzy; index of evaluating; synthesis evaluation |
| Index terms: | construction project, methodology, reinforced concrete, quantitative method, qualitative method, concrete structure, performance analysis, bidder, residential construction |
| Subjects: | production management, structural engineering, research methods, construction integration, research design and methodology, bidding, data analysis and analytics, building materials |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here