A multi-criteria decision-making approach to minimising fire risk in detached house designs

Bendak, S and Alhammadi, A A (2019) A multi-criteria decision-making approach to minimising fire risk in detached house designs. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 17(6), pp. 1146-1160. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: House fire risk would be minimised if fire safety principles were incorporated at the design stage. This issue is rarely addressed in the literature. The purpose of this study is to propose a multi-criteria decision-making framework to evaluate fire risk of detached house designs in the United Arab Emirates and countries of similar cultural background. Design/methodology/approach: The framework was developed based on function areas where (detached) house fires start, expert opinion and recommendations derived from the published literature on residential fire safety. This framework was applied to a sample of ten public detached house designs to check the applicability of the framework and to determine how safe these designs are from a fire safety perspective. Findings: The proposed framework is proven to be an effective preliminary fire risk evaluation tool of detached house designs, and more research is needed in this area. Research limitations/implications: The proposed framework is an encouraging first step in incorporating fire risk minimisation at the design stage of detached houses based on determining the preferred location of function areas but requires further development and validation, especially in other design settings. Practical implications: The proposed framework is an initial endeavour in helping designers of detached houses to minimise fire risk and its potential effects on residents. Originality/value: This research proposes a way to minimise fire risk at the design stage of detached houses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: detached house design; fire safety; house function areas; multi-criteria decision-making; residential fire causes
Index terms: fire safety, house design, evaluation tool, designer, validation, design stage, methodology, United Arab Emirates, multi-criteria decision-making, minimization
Subjects: professional practice, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, decision analysis, algorithms, research methods, professional development, design process, Geography, health safety and environment
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here