Analysis on the perceived occurrence of challenges delaying the delivery of water infrastructure assets in South Africa

Dithebe, K; Aigbavboa, C O; Thwala, W D and Oke, A E (2019) Analysis on the perceived occurrence of challenges delaying the delivery of water infrastructure assets in South Africa. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 17(3), pp. 554-571. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Minimal private participation for infrastructure development continues to affect developing economies like South Africa. This study aims to determine the perceived occurrence of challenges delaying the delivery of water infrastructure assets and the role of both public and private financing for infrastructure development. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative approach was used, and questionnaires were administered to stakeholders that have participated in delivering water infrastructure assets in South Africa. Of the 96 returned questionnaires, 91 were usable, representing 61 per cent response rate. Data from the survey were analysed using descriptive and exploratory factor analyses. The reliability test represented a value of 0.945, indicating internal consistency. Findings: Data analysis revealed that corruption, hostility, weak project structuring, high fiscal deficits by state government, cost recovery constraints, high credit risk for private financing and unreliable planning and procurement processes are major challenges delaying the delivery of water infrastructure assets. More so, municipal government remains the key custodian of water infrastructure delivery with limited support from private capital as a result of political administrative instability, legislation and policy uncertainty and inadequate risk-adjusted returns. Originality/value: Emphasis should be made on eradicating corruption and non-transparent financial management to improve municipal creditworthiness and amending and implementing much improved legislation and foreign inclusion. Additionally, financial models to complement the existing mechanisms of financing water infrastructure projects should be sought and used. Complete eradication of infrastructure challenges envisages to reduce fiscal deficits, improve service delivery and enhance the competitiveness and productivity of the economy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: infrastructure development; municipal government; policy and legislation certainty; private financing; trans-caledon authority tunnel; water sector value chain
Index terms: infrastructure delivery, developing economy, infrastructure development, survey, legislation, exploratory factor analysis, data analysis, tunnel, procurement process, South Africa, financing, methodology, questionnaire, corruption, productivity, value chain, financial management, recovery, service delivery, municipal government, infrastructure project, competitiveness
Subjects: data collection methods, economic analysis, strategic project management, legal systems, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, operations management, infrastructure engineering, value chain strategy, Geography, service delivery, research methods, management, economic development, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law, professional ethics, market analysis
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, International Construction, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here