Boyd, D and Pierce, D (2001) Implicit knowledge in construction professional practice. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.
Abstract
In educating for construction or in researching construction, it is necessary to have a deep understanding of how the industry operates. However, there is very limited information available on what construction professionals actually do in practice. What is written about is what should be done. From this there is an assumption that we do know or it is irrelevant, as we should do what the literature says should be done. This literature and assumptions rest on expertise based on the explicit technical task and process knowledge. This paper reports on a study that challenges these assumptions and is seeking to find a more relevant and useful perception of practice. The study is based on interviews with senior practitioners in the UK and the USA to determine their practice and how it has developed. Results are presented which identify the practitioner's use of a high degree of implicit knowledge that cannot be explained. In addition, their personal outlook influences their approach to the task. One location of this more extensive knowledge is in notions of teamwork which has only just been added tangentially to the technical expertise. A more holistic model is suggested which integrates the extensive implicit knowledge with technical expertise and the individual's personality.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction practice; tacit knowledge; implicit knowledge; education; research |
| Index terms: | teamwork, interview, personality, practitioner, construction professional, tacit knowledge |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, professional development, management, practitioner, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here