de Valence, Gerard and Runeson, Goran (2011) On the state of the building industry after the GFC and the Euro crisis. Construction Economics and Building, 11(4), pp. 102-113. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
There has been an intense debate in the media and among academics on how the great financial crisis has affected the global economy, and how the effects have differed in different regions of the world. This survey was designed to establish to what extent the building industry has been affected by the GFC and the Euro crisis. Over the last months we have asked senior academics and executives in construction businesses what has happened up to now in their region, what will most likely happen in the near future and in the long term. The answer is that in developed economies the effect has been a substantial downturn as finances have dried up while in developing economies in most regions, demand has been sustained due to population growth with ever increasing needs for residential building and infrastructure. While there is some apprehension about the potential effects of the Euro crisis deepening, no-one seems really worried. In the long term there is an agreement, in developed and developing countries alike, that current business models do not work and that the industry has to reinvent itself to be sustainable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; construction finance; gfc |
| Index terms: | developing economy, survey, executive, media, business model, construction finance, population, developing country, residential building, building industry |
| Subjects: | practitioner, development economics, construction type, data collection methods, economic development, financial management, business, industry analysis, demography, sociology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here