Residential adaptations as users' tacit means of communicating spatial needs in housing design: A case study

Agyefi-Mensah, S; Kpamma, Z E and Hagan, D E (2020) Residential adaptations as users' tacit means of communicating spatial needs in housing design: A case study. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), pp. 1593-1613. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Knowing and understanding the spatial needs of users is imperative for the design of livable and sustainable houses. However, the practical and theoretical difficulties associated with this, especially in social housing, create a shortfall in design knowledge known as user needs gap. To bridge this gap, design researchers over the years, have sought to provide feedback for design decision-making through post-occupancy evaluation studies using preferences and residential satisfaction as constructs. In view of their limitations, this study aims to explore residential adaptations as residents’ tacit means of communicating their spatial needs, and a pathway to understanding residents’ housing requirements. Design/methodology/approach: The study was exploratory in nature and a case study by design using a convergent parallel design within the mixed methods tradition. Activity Theory as used as a conceptual framework. The study involved three strands of research as follows: estimation of the floor areas of the rooms and spaces of the case study designs using the International Standards Organisation intramuros method; a survey of households and their activities using questionnaires; and observation of residents’ adaptations captured photographs and drawings. In all, 43 households out of the 66 apartments in the two case designs were surveyed. Findings: The study found that while the units were theoretically large, they were practically inadequate when average household sizes were taken into account in a space per person analysis. In response, particularly to sleeping requirements of children, residents make different forms of adaptations – normative, such as house sharing, compositional and organizational, as well as add-ins and add-ons including and illegal alterations. Originality/value: The paper presents residential adaptations as an empirically grounded, contextually embedded and practically useful means of exploring and understanding users’ spatial needs in housing design. Residential adaptations provide a means through which residents communicate their housing needs, albeit tacitly – a means for self-expression, self-extension and self-determination. To theory, the study shows that residential adaptations can be useful as a construct for understanding residents’ spatial needs, though fuzzy. It also helps understand how the tensions in an activity system, may result from contradictions produced by the lurking effect of contextual factors. This makes contextual knowledge, particularly cultural knowledge, critical to the design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity theory; Ghana; housing design; lefebvre; residential adaptations; spatial needs
Index terms: conceptual framework, preference, housing, design decision, methodology, housing design, self-determination, questionnaire, housing need, user need, drawing, survey, ISO, social housing, household, residential satisfaction, activity theory, post-occupancy evaluation, estimation, Ghana, children, adaptation, mixed method, case study
Subjects: construction type, data collection methods, user-centered design, user focus, human factors and perception, standards development, technical documentation, economic analysis, evaluation methods, financial and cost management, theoretical framing, design practice, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, Geography, design process, housing and residential development, demography
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here