Dauber, V F (2001) Classical lean constructs and their transferability to the construction industry. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.
Abstract
Lean production, a new production philosophy first demonstrated in the car industry, has been acclaimed as a novel performance improvement method by many in the construction industry. First implementation attempts of lean principles were documented as early as 1992. Many attempts have been made since then to implement it on a wider scale. While some argue that construction theory can only develop through successful implementation strategies, others disagree and suggest that theory building is more fundamental. Whoever is right, surely clear and concise definitions and terms are needed to initiate a debate on lean implementation protocols and processes. A coherent definition of the term lean is notable by its absence. Nevertheless, there are two dominant definitions of lean in current usage and notwithstanding the lack of concise terminology, these two perspectives on lean require closer examination. The first is based on the Toyota production philosophy whereas the other, which is termed the abstraction of lean, focuses on the elimination of waste. This paper scrutinizes both of these approaches and concludes that, while Toyota's approach is deemed to fail in construction, the abstraction of lean is no new philosophy but just good old project management.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | lean construction; lean production; manufacturing; project management; value |
| Index terms: | construction industry, implementation, project management, performance improvement, strategy, philosophy, theory building, lean production, lean construction |
| Subjects: | data science, contractual arrangements, manufacturing engineering, management, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, building construction, philosophical studies, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here