From PBL to innovation: A decennial case-study from an HPV student team

Baldissera, P and Delprete, C (2020) From PBL to innovation: A decennial case-study from an HPV student team. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(4), pp. 773-786. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The implementation of project-based learning (PBL) activities in the curricula of engineering students has become a consolidated method to improve their skills. The purpose of this paper is to share the experience acquired by the authors from a decennial case-study on a student team PBL activity focused on design and development of human-powered vehicles (HPVs). A review of the project evolution, boundary constraints and management choices could provide inspiration and suggestions to faculty staff that would like to set-up similar experiences for engineering students in their universities. Design/methodology/approach: A student team was funded by the authors in 2008 to gather engineering students interested in design and construction of HPVs. In the past decade, the team has grown from 10 up to 60 students enrolled per year and stimulated to develop a range of HPV designs for sports and mobility. The project management evolved as a consequence to com ply with the growing ambitions of the group and complexity of the goals. Findings: A thorough analysis of factors contributing to the success of the project led to identification of the key factors to increase student participation: persistence of the faculty staff is essential, attending competitions and challenges increases students’ recruitment and formal recognition of the activity through credits and the implementation of intermediate assessment steps increase the active participation rate. Bigger teams reduce the negative impact of recruits eventually abandoning the project in an early stage. Ambitious goals keep students motivated for longer periods and enable a virtuous circle by transferring enthusiasm and knowledge to new members. Research limitations/implications: The activity is analyzed starting from a subjective experience perspective and some of the findings/conclusions may be not applicable in a different context. However, such review can suggest strategies on the long-term period to create similar conditions elsewhere. Social implications: In the last part of the paper, it is pointed out how PBL projects can provide a fertile ground for innovation and lead to patents and development of new products aiming at the market. Originality/value: This study contributes to provide an insight view of how a student team PBL activity can grow over a decade if guided by faculty staff.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design team management; education practices; human-powered vehicles; innovation; project-based learning
Index terms: project-based learning, design and construction, project management, recruitment, education practice, implementation, mobility, design and development, competition, evolution, methodology, complexity, strategy, design team
Subjects: learning methods, contractual arrangements, environmental science, professional practice, management, research methods, teaching methods, design process, project management theory and practice, market analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering
Topics: Human Resources, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Education, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here