Complexity drivers in engineering design: Toward a decision support system based on an organizational perspective

Benabdellah, A C; Benghabrit, A and Bouhaddou, I (2020) Complexity drivers in engineering design: Toward a decision support system based on an organizational perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), pp. 1663-1690. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: In the era of industry 4.0, managing the design is a challenging mission. Within a dynamic environment, several disciplines have adopted the complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective. Therefore, this paper aims to explore how we may deepen our understanding of the design process as a CAS. In this respect, the key complexity drivers of the design process are discussed and an organizational decomposition for the simulation of the design process as CAS is conducted. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed methodology comprises three steps. First, the complexity drivers of the design process are presented and are matched with those of CAS. Second, an analysis of over 111 selected papers is presented to choose the appropriate model for the design process from the CAS theory. Third, the paper provides methodological guidelines to develop an organizational decision support system that supports the complexity of the design process. Findings: An analysis of the key drivers of design process complexity shows the need to adopt the CAS theory. In addition to that, a comparative analysis between all the organizational methodologies developed in the literature leads the authors to conclude that agent-oriented Software Process for engineering complex System is the appropriate methodology for simulating the design process. In this respect, a system requirements phase of the decision support system is conducted. Originality/value: The originality of this paper lies in the fact of analysing the complexity of the design process as a CAS. In doing so, all the richness of the CAS theory can be used to meet the challenges of those already existing in the theory of the design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complex adaptive system; design; simulation
Index terms: complexity, agent, methodology, comparative analysis, complex adaptive system, decision support, design process, engineering design, complex system, industry 4.0
Subjects: technology adoption, data analysis and analytics, business, practitioner, design methods, decision analysis, systems engineering, research methods, design process
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here