Khan, M R and Sonawane, A (2020) Prediction of impact response in construction safety helmet using FEA. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(3), pp. 557-566. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to present 3D finite element (FE) simulations of impact loading on a construction safety helmet over a headform to improve the ventilation slots profile in helmet design. Design/methodology/approach: Impact response on headforms in three different studies considering ventilation slots of varied profiles and dimensions in helmets with rectangular elliptical and circular slots is compared and analysed. Head injury criteria (HIC) and safety regulations from past literature have been considered to evaluate the impact responses. Findings: Simulation results show that a helmet with rectangular ventilation slots achieves a lowest peak impact force of 5941.3 N for a slot area of 170 mm2 as compared to elliptical and circular slots. Research limitations/implications: Ventilation slots of simple geometry (rectangular, elliptical and circular) have been considered in this work. Other/complex geometry slots can also be chosen to predict its effect during impact response on a helmet–headform model. Biofidelic head–neck FE model can be developed to achieve precise results. Practical implications: The presented work gives a clear idea to design engineers for the selection of ventilation slot profiles to design a construction safety helmet. Social implications: Construction safety (CS) helmets are used to reduce injuries on heads of workers at construction sites in the event of free-falling objects. Rectangular ventilation slots in CS helmets as suggested in the work may reduce the risk of injury. Originality/value: Results are found in good agreement with the past numerical simulation of impact response on a construction safety helmet over a validated biofidelic head FE model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety helmet; finite element analysis; head injury; ventilation slot |
| Index terms: | construction site, complex geometry, ventilation, injury, construction safety, methodology, regulation, engineer, numerical simulation, geometry, dimension, loading, finite element analysis |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, work location, health monitoring assessment and metrics, construction operations, air quality, mathematical modelling, profession, design complexity, health conditions and diseases, political science, environmental health, engineering analysis, research methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here