Magoda, C M; Gryzagoridis, J and Kanyarusoke, K (2021) Effective heat conductivity of Honeycomb (porous) composite panel. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(4), pp. 876-887. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to validate an assumption of what to use as an effective (steady state) heat transfer coefficient of thermal conductivity for the honeycomb core sandwiched by Fiberglass face sheets composite. A one-dimensional model based on Fourier law is developed. The results are validated experimentally. Design/methodology/approach: The results were obtained from the one-dimensional mathematical model of an overall or effective heat conductivity of the Honeycomb composite panel. These results were validated experimentally by applying heat flux on the specimen under controlled environment. The surface temperatures at different voltages were recorded and analysed. The skin of the sandwich composite material used in the investigation was Fiberglass sheet with a thickness of 0.5 mm at the bottom and 1.0 mm at the top surface. Both skins have a stacking sequence of zero degrees. Due to the presence of air cells in the core (Honeycomb), the model considers the conduction, convection and radiation heat transfer, across the thickness of the panel, combined as an effective conduction mode, whose value may be predicted by using the coefficient of thermal conductivity of the air based on the average temperature difference between the two skins. The experimental results for the heat transfer through the thickness of the panel provide validation of this assumption/prediction. Both infrared thermography and conventional temperature measurement techniques (thermocouples) were used to collect the data. Findings: The heat transfer experiment and mathematical modeling were conducted. The data obtained were analyzed, and it was found that the effective thermal conductivity was temperature-dependent as expected. The effective thermal conductivity of the honeycomb panel was close to that of air, and its value could be predicted if the panel surface temperatures were known. It was also found that as temperature raised the variation between experimental and predicted effective air conduction raised up. This is because there was an increase in molecular diffusion and vibration. Therefore, the convection heat transfer increased at high temperatures and the air became an insulator. Originality/value: Honeycomb composite panels have excellent physical and thermal properties that influence their performance. This study provides an appropriate method in determining thermal conductivity, which is one of the critical thermal properties of porous composite material. This paper also gives useful and practical data to industries that use or manufacture honeycomb composite panels.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | heat conductivity; infrared thermography; porous composite material |
| Index terms: | high temperature, mathematical modelling, presence, investigation, thermal conductivity, temperature measurement, surface temperature, heat conductivity, thermocouple, composite, thermal property, vibration, methodology, variation, porous composite material, validation, infrared thermography, face, experiment, stacking, thickness, mathematical model |
| Subjects: | materials science, mechanical systems, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, analytical methods, environmental science, psychology, professional development, contractual condition, material properties and characteristics, computer vision, research methods, traditional and composite building materials, structural engineering, thermal systems |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here