Marinelli, M and Salopek, M (2020) Joint risk management and collaborative ethos: Exploratory research in the UK construction sector. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(2), pp. 343-361. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Based on experience from the UK construction industry, this paper aims to capture the dimensions of the collaborative ethos required for successful implementation of Joint Risk Management, i.e. the cooperative and dynamic risk management approach that continues into the post-contract stage and is jointly undertaken by different project stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed methods research approach involving semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey was adopted to provide the basis for the statistical analysis encompassing descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests and exploratory factor analysis. Findings: The analysis highlights the critical role of team integration achieved through the diffusion of collaborative values at strategic and practical level. Relevant applications include early stakeholder engagement, common goals and interests, team building activities and contractual flexibility. Originality/value: This research is beneficial for the industry and academia as it enhances the understanding of an under-utilised management tool and highlights the requirements for its successful implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; construction contracts; risk management; UK |
| Index terms: | statistical analysis, team building, mixed method, implementation, construction industry, statistics, dimension, stakeholder engagement, academia, exploratory research, risk management, construction contract, survey, exploratory factor analysis, interview, construction sector, integration, methodology, collaboration, project stakeholder, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, industry analysis, sociology, educational institutions, organizational analysis, research methods, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, data science, community and social dimensions, contract type, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Education, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here