A scan to as-built building information modeling workflow: A case study in Malaysia

Usmani, A R A; Elshafey, A; Gheisari, M; Chai, C; Aminudin, E B and Tan, C S (2020) A scan to as-built building information modeling workflow: A case study in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(4), pp. 923-940. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Three dimensional (3 D) laser scanner surveying is widely used in many fields, such as agriculture, mining and heritage documentation and can be of great benefit for as-built documentation in construction and facility management domains. However, there is lack of applied research and use cases integrating 3 D laser scanner surveying with building information modeling (BIM) for existing facilities in Malaysia. This study aims to develop a scan to as-built BIM workflow to use 3 D laser scanner surveying and create as-built building information models of an existing complex facility in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach: A case study approach was followed to develop a scan to as-built BIM workflow through four main steps: 3 D laser scanning, data preprocessing, data registration and building information modeling. Findings: This case study proposes a comprehensive scan to as-built BIM workflow which illustrates all the required steps to create a precise 3 D as-built building information model from scans. This workflow was successfully implemented to the Eco-Home facility at the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Originality/value: Scan to as-built BIM is a digital alternative to manual and tedious process of documentation of as-built condition of a facility and provides a detail process using laser scans to create as-built building information models of facilities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: as-built; building information modeling; case study; facility; laser scanning; Malaysia
Index terms: case study, Malaysia, building information modelling, mining, surveying, documentation, laser scanning, methodology, workflow
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, data collection methods, geotechnical engineering, information systems, management, research methods, Geography, professional development
Topics: Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here