The application of risk management principles to crisis management in construction

Gunning, J G and Hanna, J I C (2001) The application of risk management principles to crisis management in construction. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.

Abstract

A prayer by St. Francis reads "Give us the strength to change the things we can, to accept the things we cannot change, and the wisdom to know the difference". The first part (and, to an extent, the third part) of this message is embodied within the practices of Risk Management. The second, an acceptance of some possible occurrences, lies more in the area of Crisis Management. Crisis Management does not mean a blind reaction to situations, but involves some proactive preparation for unwelcome and unpredictable disasters which are an occasional part of the construction process. The literature on Crisis Management goes back over 20 years, and uses definitions of Crisis Management along the lines of "any incident that can focus negative attention on a business or project and that can have an adverse effect upon its overall financial condition, its relationships or its reputation". Any proactive organization should emphasize the importance of identifying risks and take appropriate measures to minimize the likelihood of crises developing. Crisis Management planning requires a blend of skills with an effective team approach. Designated back-up may also be needed. Staff must be trained and regular scenario planning will develop an ability to reduce the effects of any crisis. In construction, the most likely crises will be safety- related, but litigation, environmental problems and damage to public services are also very common. Applying techniques of Risk Management to Crisis Management planning is a logical development. This paper will make recommendations as to how the construction industry might become more effective in preparing for and managing the crises which may arise.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: crisis management; perception; risk avoidance; risk
Index terms: litigation, scenario planning, public services, construction industry, crisis management, risk management, construction process
Subjects: dispute resolution, risk assessment, financial risk, management, administrative law, industry analysis, building construction
Topics: Site Management, Legal Issues, Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here