Yap, J B H and Toh, H M (2020) Investigating the principal factors impacting knowledge management implementation in construction organisations. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(1), pp. 55-69. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Knowledge management (KM) is crucial to ensure construction organisations effectively take advantage of existing expertise, engendering faster and more effective decision-making. Most importantly, it helps organisations to learn from past experiences. Despite its increasing academic attention, the implementation of KM is still relatively slow across the construction industry. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to gain a renewed understanding of the extent of KM practices in construction. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative approach using a questionnaire survey was used to prioritise the 15 critical factors and 9 enables of knowledge creation. Finally, an exploratory factor analysis is used to determine the principal elements of successful KM implementation in construction. Findings: KM in a construction organisation is significantly influenced by knowledge sharing, collaboration, learning from mistakes, employee training and knowledge strategy. On the other hand, knowledge is created mostly through project mistakes, individual constant self-improvement, challenging barrier, review session and brainstorming discussion. With factor analysis technique, three underlying factors impacting KM practices are capacity and capability improvement, long-term commitment and innovation and synergetic working culture. Research limitations/implications: Questionnaire survey was used as the single data collection instrument. The findings of the current study shed light on the salient issues affecting KM practices in construction but may not generalise to organisations operating in other industries. Practical implications: These findings can support first-order KM implementation decision-making and enable the exploitation of existing knowledge assets towards achieving sustainable development and competitive advantage. Originality/value: Effective KM practices are about finding the best ways to deliver the right knowledge to the right person at the right time, enabling informed decision-making and improving operational efficiencies. The contribution of this study is built upon the examination of the underlying factors of KM implementation; the findings provide insights into the core aspects of KM practices, facilitating managers in prioritising KM strategies that are really going to make a difference.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; factor analysis; knowledge creation; knowledge management; learning organisation |
| Index terms: | efficiency, construction organization, competitive advantage, prioritizing, critical factor, exploitation, factor analysis, implementation, construction industry, knowledge creation, manager, exploratory factor analysis, commitment, sustainable development, strategy, survey, knowledge sharing, methodology, decision-making, collaboration, questionnaire, knowledge management |
| Subjects: | psychology, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, data collection methods, risk assessment, organization, practitioner, market analysis, decision analysis, industry analysis, statistical analysis, management, research methods, performance management, health safety and environment, professional development |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here