Hosseini, M R; Edwards, D J; Singh, T; Martek, I and Amos, D (2021) Engineering project networks: Providing "sustainable work systems" for construction knowledge workers. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(1), pp. 21-40. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
The construction industry faces three emergent developments that in all likelihood will transform the industry into the future. First, engineering project networks (EPNs), in which teams collaborate on projects remotely in time and space, are transforming global construction practices. Second, as a major consumer of resources and significant producer of green-house gases, construction is under pressure to reduce its carbon footprint. Third, the construction industry presents as one of the least socially sustainable work environments, with high job dissatisfaction, skewed work–life balance and over representation of depressive and mental disorders. It is incumbent on the industry to reconcile these issues. Specifically, what scope is there to shape the evolution of EPNs towards a configuration that both promotes sustainability generally, and enhances quality of work-life issues, while at the same time continuing to apprehend the economic dividends for which it is adopted? As salient as this question is, it has not been broached in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to survey the extent to which EPNs align with the sustainability agenda, more broadly, and that of employee work-place satisfaction, more specifically. A literature review of current knowledge of these concerns is explored and a summative assessment presented. To the best of the authors' knowledge, as the first in its kind, the study brings to light that EPNs go a long way towards facilitating economic objectives, part way towards realising ecological and sociological objectives but make hardly any impact on improving employee work satisfaction. This paper examines an entirely novel area that has not been studied yet. Future research should take up this finding to determine how EPNs may be further adapted to accommodate these wider necessary objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon footprint; employee; sustainability |
| Index terms: | configuration, evolution, survey, literature review, engineering project network, face, construction industry, work environment, global construction, mental disorder, satisfaction, carbon footprint |
| Subjects: | health conditions and diseases, systems engineering, industry analysis, management, psychology, project delivery, project planning, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, strategic management, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here