Work based learning for construction management courses

Hill, C (2001) Work based learning for construction management courses. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.

Abstract

Some criticisms of work based learning have raised the issue that such learning as essentially an employer focused activity intended to train an individual for a specific role in an organization. In this sense the organization (employer) has benefits to gain from the process which are perhaps greater than the individual. The academic perspective of education per se is that it is a social good, for the benefit of the individual, and for the benefit of the society in which that individual is a constituent. The paper reports the initial experiences of staff, students and employers on a BSc (Hons) Construction Management course which incorporates a period of assessed industrial experience. The assessment of this experience uses the competence framework provided by the Chartered Institute of Building Professional Development Programme as its basis. This paper claims that the incorporation of the Professional Competencies as a frame of assessment addresses this issue. The competencies are vocational in nature and have been developed to reflect the needs of most employers involved in construction. Furthermore, the Professional Institute in its' charter, has to reflect the overall social good of the activities of its' members. These activities are in turn reflected in the competencies described in the PDP.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: professional; competence; work based learning
Index terms: building professional, competence, work-based learning, society, programme
Subjects: communities and social development, project controls, personnel development, learning methods, profession
Topics: Education, Time Control, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here