Nyawera, J X and Theodore Conrad, H (2021) Critical drivers towards generative process health and safety culture. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(2), pp. 385-411. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
This paper aims to report on the development of a model to improve process health and safety within the context of a petrochemical environment to achieve a generative health and safety culture within that sector. A quantitative research methodology and deductive research approach were used in the study. A survey was conducted in a major petrochemical enterprise in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa with 259 returned and duly completed questionnaires. The data was statistically analysed using statistical packages for social science version 25. This study found that the key process health and safety critical drivers needed to grow a generative process health and safety culture were leadership commitment, chemical exposure management, health and safety risk assessment, process hazard analysis and permit to work. This study was conducted in the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa within the petrochemical industry. Because of self-reported methods of data collection, there is a probability of bias existing in the results of the study. The contribution of this research is to understand, based on theoretical assumptions, how health and safety improvement could be institutionalised in an organisation. The developed model can be used as a practical tool. This paper is part of the larger discussion of increasing importance in health and safety policy-making. This study aims at contributing to the literature in the field of health and safety by incorporating the drivers towards a generative process health and safety culture. This study provides a model to assist senior management to reduce exposure to process health and safety hazards in the petrochemical industry and improve overall performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | social science; hazards; health and safety; improvement; leadership; performance; policy; safety; bias; culture; quantitative research; probability; South Africa |
| Index terms: | social science, risk assessment, package, quantitative research, South Africa, exposure, methodology, bias, questionnaire, commitment, survey, health and safety |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, psychology, health safety and environment, Geography, probability and distributions, financial risk, theoretical framing, research methods, public and environmental health |
| Topics: | Procurement, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here