On-site labour productivity of New Zealand construction industry: Key constraints and improvement measures

Durdyev, S and Mbachu, J (2011) On-site labour productivity of New Zealand construction industry: Key constraints and improvement measures. Construction Economics and Building, 11(3), pp. 18-33. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Productivity is key to the survival and growth of any organisation, industry or nation. Some factors constrain the achievement of the set project objectives in the New Zealand building and construction industry and are responsible for the reported steady decline of productivity and performance. This study aims to identify the key constraints to on-site labour productivity and improvement measures. Using the descriptive survey method, views of some project managers, contractors and subcontractors in New Zealand were canvassed via pilot interviews and questionnaire surveys at the qualitative and quantitative data gathering stages, respectively. Multi-attribute technique was used to analyse the quantitative data. Results showed that the key external constraints to on-site labour productivity comprise, in order of decreasing impact, statutory compliance, unforeseen events and wider external dynamics. The internal constraints were found to have much higher impact on onsite productivity than the external factors. In order of diminishing levels of impact, the internal constraints comprise reworks, level of skill and experience of the workforce, adequacy of method of construction, buildability issues, and inadequate supervision and coordination. The factors underlying each broad category of external and internal constraints are reported. The relative levels of impact of the identified constraints are expected to guide the project team in addressing the constraints in a cost-effective manner.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; labour productivity; New Zealand construction industry; performance improvement; productivity constraints
Index terms: rework, productivity, construction industry, subcontractor, project team, supervision, coordination, survival, survey, key constraint, dynamics, interview, compliance, onsite, performance improvement, questionnaire, labour productivity, buildability, New Zealand, project manager
Subjects: operations management, building construction, systems engineering, project delivery, industry analysis, environmental science, design efficiency, performance measurement, profession, data collection methods, management, control systems, practitioner, health safety and environment, Geography
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Site Management, Quality Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here