An investigation into the role of the quantity surveyor in the value management workshop process

Spellacy, J; Edwards, D J; Roberts, C J; Hayhow, S and Shelbourn, M (2021) An investigation into the role of the quantity surveyor in the value management workshop process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(2), pp. 423-445. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the value management workshop process and specifically identifies the roles and responsibilities of the quantity surveyor within this. Information accrued is then used to develop a novel template value management workshop that provides a platform for educating future quantity surveying and other construction professionals. This research adopts a mixed philosophical epistemological design that uses interpretivism with elements of postpositivism. Specifically, a cross-sectional study of extant literature informs the development of a structured questionnaire that is posed to focus group participants (consisting of experienced industrial practitioners) to secure qualitative feedback and validate the template. Research findings reveal that the roles and responsibilities of the quantity surveyor in the value management workshop process have hitherto received scant academic attention. Additionally, literature has revealed that available information on workshop content is limited, leading to ineffective studies. There has also been a miscommunication among construction practitioners in relation to the quantity surveyor's role in the workshop process. Following extensive research, a novel template has been created which identifies the content of each workshop session alongside the roles and responsibilities of the quantity surveyor (and other construction professionals) which can be used for educational purposes. The literature revealed that scant academic and professional governing body(ies) attention has been paid to the education and training of future generations of quantity surveyors involved in value management. Specifically, there is limited applied case study evidence to investigate this phenomenon and, hence, the workshop curricular presents advance knowledge in this respect and provides a practical template solution.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; education; feedback; quantity surveying; training; value management; professional; quantity surveyor; roles; case study; focus group
Index terms: focus group, interpretivism, surveying, construction practitioner, evidence, questionnaire, practitioner, quantity surveying, platform, workshop, case study, construction professional, investigation, value management, education and training
Subjects: construction type, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics, management, theoretical framing, digital design, professional development, professional education
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Information Management, Education, Digital Applications, Value Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here