Tai, S; Zhang, Y and Li, T (2021) Factors affecting BIM application in China: A social network model. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(2), pp. 373-384. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to promote the application of building information modeling (BIM) in China's construction industry, key factors and their relationships are explored. Based on a literature review, 28 factors were extracted and their relationships (239 in total) obtained using the Delphi method. A social network model of the factors was constructed and factors were analyzed using social network analysis (SNA). The top 10 key factors and their relationships were obtained using SNA. Among the top 10 critical factors, six were source factors. They were: training for the application of BIM, guidance from experts, proper management modes, efficient BIM teams, specifications and demonstrations and standards for building information communication. The other four factors included as follows: a willingness to accept BIM, knowledge of its value and benefits, the definition of its benefits and the availability of IT software and hardware. These were mediating factors that could further the influence of the source factors. The results provide useful information for public agencies and professionals to understand the immediate and mediating influences of the factors on the application of BIM. Solutions and future efforts for different participants are presented to promote the application of BIM-based on the key factors and their relationships.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; specifications; standards; training; professional; social network analysis; network analysis; social network analysis; China |
| Index terms: | China, agency, specification, social network analysis, social network, literature review, hardware, construction industry, Delphi method, building information modelling, network analysis, critical factor |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, computer hardware, data collection methods, risk assessment, information systems, industry analysis, sociology, contractual condition, Geography, research methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here