Adaku, E; Ankrah, N A and Ndekugri, I E (2022) Prevention through design: Conceptual models for the assessment of a principal designer's skills, knowledge and experience. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(3), pp. 595-623. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The prevention through design (PtD) initiative places a duty on designers to originate designs that are inherently safe for construction, maintenance, occupation and demolition. In the UK, legislation has been introduced creating a new statutory role called the principal designer (PD) to ensure that PtD occurs during the design process. To realize this objective, PDs under the regulations must have appropriate skills, knowledge and experience (SKE) of occupational safety and health risks as they relate to construction products. However, there is a paucity of knowledge, in the extant literature and in practice, regarding what specifically constitutes PDs' SKE of PtD and how to measure the same. Design/methodology/approach: The study undertook a systematic review of meanings of SKE and carried out content analyses to provide robust conceptualizations of the constructs SKE. This underpinned the development of nomological networks to operationalize the constructs SKE in respect of PDs' ability to ensure PtD. Findings: PDs' SKE of PtD are presented as multidimensional constructs that can be operationalized at different levels of specificity in three theoretical models. Practical implications: The models indicated in this study can assist project clients to clarify the PtD SKE of prospective PDs in the procurement process. Correspondingly, PDs can look to these frameworks to identify their SKE gaps and take steps to address them. Originality/value: This study contributes to the PtD literature by providing theoretical frameworks to clarify the PtD SKE of PDs. The study provides a basis for future research to empirically test the attributes of these as they relate to PDs' competence to ensure PtD.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; experience; integrated model; knowledge; prevention through design; skills |
| Index terms: | occupational safety and health, procurement process, construction product, duty, competence, methodology, prevention, occupation, designer, project client, legislation, systematic literature review, meaning, design process, integrated model, regulation, content analysis |
| Subjects: | personnel development, political science, analytical methods, profession, data analysis and analytics, sociology, contractual role, research methods, financial risk, legal systems, occupational health and safety management, design methods, research evaluation and metrics, contractual arrangements, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Governance, Information Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Human Resources, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here