Aigbavboa, C O; Aghimien, D O; Thwala, W D and Ngozwana, M N (2022) Unprepared industry meet pandemic: COVID-19 and the South Africa construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(1), pp. 183-200. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to determine the responses of construction organisations to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated lockdown and the impact on the South African construction industry (SACI). Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a quantitative survey with responses sought from 825 contracting organisation’s representatives drawn from the database of the construction industry development board. The data gathered were analysed using percentage, mean item score and one-sample t-test. The reliability of the research instrument was also tested using the Cronbach alpha test. Findings: Findings revealed that most construction organisations implemented a complete travel ban and halting all business operations on sites and offices in a bid to curb the spread of the virus. Furthermore, whilst most construction organisations envisage significant disruption in their project delivery, the problem of job losses was regarded as a short, medium and long-term impact of the pandemic. Loss of revenue, a decline in the economy and business interruption are also some of the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the SACI. Originality/value: The study’s findings give practical insights on the potential impact of the pandemic on the construction industry and the possible approach needed to help cushion the effect on the industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; construction safety; COVID-19; global pandemic; impact |
| Index terms: | database, construction industry development, construction organization, pandemic, project delivery, coronavirus, construction industry, revenue, survey, COVID-19, cushion, South Africa, contracting organization, construction safety, methodology |
| Subjects: | project delivery, economic analysis, building materials, practitioner, organization, data collection methods, environmental health, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, data management, development economics, Geography, research methods, health risk and incident analysis |
| Topics: | International Construction, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here