Ayodele, T O and Kajimo-Shakantu, K (2022) Challenges and drivers to data sharing among stakeholders in the South African construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(6), pp. 1698-1715. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the challenges to data sharing among construction stakeholders in the South African construction industry and also assess stakeholders' perceptions of the benefits of data sharing. Design/methodology/approach: This study is a cross-sectional survey administered via a Web-based online survey on construction professionals registered with the South African Council for the Project and Construction Management Professions (SACPCMP). The respondents rated on a five-point Likert scale the level of influence of the challenges of, and the benefits derivable from data sharing. These were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Findings: The results of the principal component analysis (PCA) presented a five-factor structure of the challenges to data sharing, including reporting context/framework/lack of expertise, cost considerations/clients' influences, data interoperability, stakeholders conservative attitude and personal interest/data confidentiality. These have percentage variances 17.124%, 16.929%, 13.786%, 13.353% and 12.961%, respectively. For the benefits of data sharing, the constructs were categorized into four themes, namely, optimal project decisions/stakeholders' confidence, benchmarking/ collaboration among firms, time and cost benefits and enhanced market intelligence. These have respective variances of 24.598%, 18.393%, 16.160% and 14.685%. Practical implications: It is expected that this study will provide information to stakeholders towards implementation policies and practices that could eliminate the challenges to data sharing and assemblage, thereby enhancing the level of data sharing in the construction industry. Originality/value: Given the increasing global and technological changes, it might be expected that there will be an increased appeal by construction stakeholders towards embracing data sharing and assemblage owing to the inherent benefits and value.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benefits; challenges; construction stakeholders; data assemblage; data sharing; fourth industrial revolution |
| Index terms: | profession, principal component analysis, construction professional, fourth industrial revolution, technological change, implementation, construction industry, variance, data interoperability, collaboration, methodology, confidentiality, Likert scale, benchmarking, market intelligence, survey |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, professional ethics, industry analysis, measurement and scaling, professional development, research methods, data exchange, management, performance measurement, technology adoption, contractual arrangements, innovation studies, institututions, data collection methods, strategic management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here