Hamida, M B and Hassanain, M A (2022) A framework model for AEC/FM knowledge in adaptive reuse projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(3), pp. 624-648. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to present a generic lifecycle framework model for guiding architects, engineers, contractors and facilities managers (AEC/FM) practitioners on the effective implementation of adaptive reuse projects. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative techniques was followed in the development of the framework model. A literature review was conducted to comprehend the processes involved in adaptive reuse projects. In total, 90 AEC/FM practitioners were surveyed to identify the current practices in these projects. A generic framework model was then developed to standardize the processes involved, using integration definition for function modeling process modeling methodology. Face-to-face interviews with a targeted group of 30 AEC/FM practitioners were conducted, to validate the developed framework model, by assessing the importance and the frequency of implementing each function in the developed framework model. Findings: The framework model consisted of four sequential processes, namely, assess the feasibility of the adaptive reuse project, design the adaptive reuse project, construct the adaptive reuse project and operate and maintain the adaptive reuse project. The validation confirmed the importance of all the framework functions and the frequency of their implementation. Originality/value: This research contributes to the literature and the AEC/FM professions, through developing a lifecycle and knowledge-oriented framework model for building adaptive reuse. The framework presents clear documentation of adaptive reuse processes. Thus, it holds the potential of endeavoring on adaptive reuse projects to be more efficient.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; AEC/fm; buildings; framework model; lifecycle; projects |
| Index terms: | documentation, literature review, face, process modelling, interview, practitioner, validation, facilities manager, methodology, integration, engineer, adaptive reuse, implementation, modelling, architect, lifecycle, profession |
| Subjects: | design analysis, psychology, analytical methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, profession, institututions, practitioner, organizational analysis, research methods, professional development, sustainable design |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here