Jones, W; Gibb, A G F and Chow, V (2022) Adapting to COVID-19 on construction sites: What are the lessons for long-term improvements in safety and worker effectiveness? Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(1), pp. 66-85. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Substantial changes were made on many UK construction projects in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to explore the unanticipated positive consequences of these and the scope for longer-term learning and developments within the sector. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative approach was used, semi-structured interviews were conducted across six major project sites. Interviewees (n = 33) included site and senior managers, supply chain representatives and occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals. The interviews explored their experiences of working on site during the pandemic, the changes made to work practices and their perceived impacts of these changes. Findings: Improved planning and work sequencing were part of the revised process to make sites COVID-secure. This increased worker effectiveness and housekeeping/tidiness. The view on some sites was that this would improve OSH performance. The changes were perceived to be beneficial but may not be accepted by clients in the long term, as they could result in projects taking longer to complete. The ways in which COVID-19 risk has been communicated and perceived also provides longer-term lessons for the sector’s OSH management and training. Originality/value: Construction has adapted rapidly and effectively to new ways of working during the pandemic. This research captured in real time some of the changes made and presents an argument for embedding and adopting the changes to improve working arrangements and OSH within the construction sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client; construction; COVID-19; health; health and safety; productivity; safety; site management |
| Index terms: | site management, real time, occupational safety and health, effectiveness, pandemic, productivity, qualitative approach, major project, work practice, construction project, methodology, construction sector, interview, manager, COVID-19, health and safety, construction site |
| Subjects: | management, health risk and incident analysis, performance management, research methods, health safety and environment, production management, project controls, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, data collection methods, practitioner, work location, construction operations, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here