King, S S; Rahman, R A; Fauzi, M A and Haron, A T (2022) Critical analysis of pandemic impact on AEC organizations: The COVID-19 case. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(1), pp. 358-383. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the interrelationships between COVID-19 pandemic impact and architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) organizations. To achieve that aim, the objectives are to: identify the critical pandemic impact (CPI) of COVID-19 on AEC organizations; compare the CPI between the different organization characteristics; and analyze the interrelationships between the CPI. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review of 519 articles and in-depth interviews with 40 AEC practitioners were carried out, yielding 12 COVID-19 impacts. Then, data on the 12 impact’s criticality were collected through a survey among AEC practitioners. In total, 127 valid responses were received and analyzed using mean ranking analysis, analysis of variance and Spearman’s correlation. The findings were also compared with pandemic impacts from prior works. Findings: Five CPI exist among the 12 impacts, namely, “reduced construction productivity,” “reduced foreign investment in the construction industry,” “reduced demand on construction-related works,” “disruption in the supply chain” and “reduced number of public projects.” “Reduced foreign investment in the construction industry” and “reduced demand on construction-related works” significantly impact small-medium enterprises than large enterprises. Also, “disruption in the supply chain” and “reduced construction productivity” are recurring impacts in all countries compared. Finally, moderate relationships exist between “reduced foreign investment in the construction industry” and “reduced demand on construction-related works” and “disruption in the supply chain” and “reduced construction productivity.” Originality/value: The findings can be used to prioritize available resources in developing short-term responses for COVID-19. Also, action plans can be developed to mitigate the CPI from recurring.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AEC industry; AEC organizations; built environment research; COVID-19; impact; organizational issues; project management; small and medium enterprises |
| Index terms: | pandemic, public project, COVID-19, built environment research, methodology, project management, foreign investment, variance, survey, systematic literature review, construction industry, interview, practitioner, organizational issue, construction productivity |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, research methods, operations management, health risk and incident analysis, business, research management, practitioner, industry analysis, economic analysis, research evaluation and metrics, infrastructure engineering, project management theory and practice, measurement and scaling |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here