Leon, M and Laing, R (2022) A concept design stages protocol to support collaborative processes in architecture, engineering and construction projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(3), pp. 777-799. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper proposes and tests, through a series of structured multi-disciplinary design activities, a “Concept Design Stages Protocol” (CDS Protocol) to structure project initiation, to attain smoother collaboration and greater consensus among multi-disciplinary project teams. Design/methodology/approach: A collaborative approach from the outset is imperative for project success, especially when considering multi-disciplinary teams in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. However, involving different disciplines hinders communication paths and affects informed decision-making. Findings: Based on these findings, the research demonstrates that the CDS Protocol provides a solid foundation to aid in the optimal implementation of collaborative design, and with particular regard to multi-disciplinary working. Originality/value: The research demonstrates the potential for significant improvement in the optimisation of the conceptual design stages, with positive implications for time, communication and whole-team engagement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AEC projects; collaborative processes; design protocol; design stages; multi-disciplinary teams |
| Index terms: | project success, concept design, implementation, project team, construction project, collaboration, methodology, decision-making, design stage, collaborative design, conceptual design |
| Subjects: | design methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, professional practice, research methods, design practice, management, design process, project management theory and practice, production management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here