Noorian Talouki, R; Hosseini Shirvani, M and Motameni, H (2022) A hybrid meta-heuristic scheduler algorithm for optimization of workflow scheduling in cloud heterogeneous computing environment. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(6), pp. 1581-1605. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Improvement of workflow scheduling in distributed engineering systems Design/methodology/approach: The authors proposed a hybrid meta heuristic optimization algorithm. Findings: The authors have made improvement in hybrid approach by exploiting of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing plus points. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper presents a novel theorem and novel hybrid approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cloud heterogeneous platforms; computer simulation; genetic algorithms; hybrid meta-heuristic approach; optimization algorithms; workflow scheduling |
| Index terms: | computer simulation, genetic algorithm, scheduling, scheduler, workflow, simulated annealing, computing, optimization algorithm, methodology, platform, heuristic, systems design |
| Subjects: | operations research, modelling and simulation, risk assessment, practitioner, computing systems, design methods, management, research methods, algorithms, digital design |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here