Design and evaluation of a refractance window lab-scale dryer

Ssenyimba, S; Kigozi, J; Tumutegyereize, P; Muyonga, J H and Mutumba, R (2022) Design and evaluation of a refractance window lab-scale dryer. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(6), pp. 1499-1518. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Refractance window drying (RWD) has been identified as the method that can give high-quality products at a relatively low production cost. However, knowledge about its use and adoption remains lacking both in academic curricula and industry in the developing world. Design/methodology/approach: A lab-scale batch RWD of a closed-loop control system was designed, fabricated and evaluated for drying rates, evaporation rate, the energy of evaporation, energy efficiency and throughput. Testing was done using mango and tomato pulps. Findings: Drying rates at 95°C of 1.32 gg−1min−1 and 0.854 gg−1min−1 at 2 and 3 mm, respectively, for tomato, 0.6 gg−1min−1 and 0.33 gg−1min−1 at 2 and 3 mm for mango pulp were obtained. The dryer had an evaporation rate of 4.63 × 10–4 kg/s and 4.25 × 10–4 kg/s, the energy of evaporation of 1.05 kW and 0.96 kW and thermal energy efficiency of 25.64% and 21.73% while drying tomato and mango pulps, respectively. Dryer throughput of 0.6 kg/h of dried mango Pulp and 0.47 kg/h of dried tomato pulp was obtained. Originality/value: The designed RWD can be adequately used in laboratory experiments on different products to produce powders. This will enable the transfer of knowledge about RWD technology in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: closed-loop control system; energy efficiency; lab-scale; material component and systems performance; process control; product quality; quality management; refractance window dryer; research design; systems design
Index terms: process control, component and systems performance, control system, methodology, window, thermal energy, production cost, laboratory, developing country, experiment, systems design, testing, quality management, efficiency, energy efficiency, product quality, research design
Subjects: monitoring and control, development economics, manufacturing engineering, architectural elements, performance management, research methods, thermal systems, quality assurance, research management, building performance, control systems, design methods, data collection methods, research design and methodology, professional practice, sustainability and energy
Topics: Design Practice, International Construction, Quality Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here