An investigation into the use of facilities management in institutions of higher learning in South Africa

Kotzé, M and Nkado, R N (2001) An investigation into the use of facilities management in institutions of higher learning in South Africa. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.

Abstract

Education is about excellence. Unsatisfactory facilities will affect the ability of institutions of higher learning to provide excellent education. The paper investigates the current level of awareness of facilities management (FM) at institutions of higher learning in South Africa and whether management structures allow directors of FM departments to exert strategic influence on the institutions' planning and policies. Following a review of related literature and preliminary interviews, exploratory data was obtained from responses to a structured questionnaire, which was sent to the directors of the facilities management divisions of the 41 residential universities and technikons in South Africa. Results showed that there is a high level of awareness of facilities management among the directors. Although the reporting structure of 64% of the directors connect directly to their institutions' executive management, no significant difference was found in the proportion of their reactive versus proactive approach to maintenance management when compared to those of directors whose reporting structure is further removed from their institution's executive management. This finding suggests that effective facilities management has not been fully adopted by institutions of higher learning.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: facilities management; tertiary institution; South Africa; education; maintenance; questionnaire survey
Index terms: interview, South Africa, investigation, questionnaire, survey, facilities management, tertiary, executive, maintenance management
Subjects: practitioner, management, maintenance engineering, curriculum development, data collection methods, Geography
Topics: Education, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here